Blender magazine lives up to its name this month, with a cover for which they apparently threw a bunch of body parts in a blender and created a senseless Britney Spears composite. The ashtray’s a nice touch, but other than that…
As Britney would say, “Huh?”
I’m just happy to know I DON’T have to be Tila Tequila. You have no idea how close I was to pursuing a career as a MySpace “model/actress” and changing my name to Candy Cocktail. What a relief!
I love Blender, they sometimes print my reader-mail. But yeah, what exactly are they going for with this ‘Britney’? They should have shown her scrawling “I’m not crazy” in lipstick on a mirror… or maybe a cheerleader type pyramid of paparazzos, with Adnan on the top, waving a picture of Britney. that would be more telling.
January 28th, 2008 at 11:14 amBritney looks great on this Magazine cover!
January 28th, 2008 at 11:40 amI wonder what the girl whose body that is looks like.
Because we all know that Britney’s body looks nothing like what is on that cover!
uh, yeah, we do know, especially because the caption tells us…
January 28th, 2008 at 11:58 ami don’t think that her face even looks right…something “off” there
January 28th, 2008 at 11:59 ami agree mmb. that’s a bad photoshopping job.
January 28th, 2008 at 12:15 pmYea MMB, it does say at the bottom that’s not her body. And her face looks like one from 10 years ago. They should’ve added Cheetos fingerprints on that white sheet.
January 28th, 2008 at 1:12 pmJulie-so true! Cheetos! Maybe a copy of the Koran too LOL
And even though it’s an old picture, it still doesn’t look “right”…i think they tried to morph a few together.
January 29th, 2008 at 7:38 amyou know what else–the caption says that is “sadly” not her body..i mean, is that the issue? what her body looks like? that it’s not as “sexy” as it once was? I mean, “sadly?” that’s almost insulting.
January 29th, 2008 at 7:39 amYou’re right, MMB. It’s completely insulting. As though the fact that she doesn’t have a “still developing” body was her biggest concern. Or anybody else’s.
January 29th, 2008 at 8:36 amyeah! “that, sadly, is not her body.” sadly for who? a bunch of pervs?
January 29th, 2008 at 10:45 amLOL ~ exactly. A bunch of pedophiles.
January 29th, 2008 at 1:29 pm